Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alana Parnaby vs Amelia Zylberman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parnaby vs Zylberman analysis and find out who is favored!
Alana Parnaby vs Amelia Zylberman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Parnaby 1 - 0 Zylberman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parnaby has won 39.85% of points on their second serve, while Zylberman has won 33.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parnaby, in recent form, has won 54.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zylberman has won 60.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.67% and 35.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parnaby has saved 53.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zylberman has saved 46.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parnaby has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 20/ 24), with Zylberman winning 46.15% (W/L 6/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parnaby has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 34/ 43). Zylberman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Parnaby has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Zylberman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 4/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Parnaby winning 1 times and Zylberman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Parnaby winning 2 and Zylberman winning 0. The last match between Parnaby and Zylberman was at the W75 Burnie, 28-01-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Alana Parnaby getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parnaby and Zylberman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Parnaby winning 0 times and Zylberman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Parnaby winning 0, and Zylberman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parnaby has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.77 while Zylberman has played against players with an average rank of 118.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parnaby has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zylberman has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parnaby has converted 48.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zylberman has converted 58.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
641
Rank
428
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
46% (168-194)
Career Total W/L
47% (8-9)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Alana Parnaby vs Amelia Zylberman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Parnaby VS Zylberman
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Alana Parnaby | Amelia Zylberman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (35/52) | 43% (17/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 59% (10/17) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (10/17) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (21/40) | 31% (16/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Alana Parnaby
Player
Amelia Zylberman
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alana Parnaby | Amelia Zylberman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (24/25) | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (220/223) | 37% (48/81) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:27 | 1:6:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.9 | 220.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (944/1453) | 50% (156/310) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (620/944) | 55% (86/156) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (204/509) | 31% (48/154) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (76/156) | 52% (13/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (612/1408) | 40% (120/298) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (10/10) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (5/0) |
Alana Parnaby Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Alana Parnaby
90%
(
52 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Sophie Chang
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Urszula Radwanska
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Nicole Giannini
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Alana Parnaby
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Alana Parnaby
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
Player
Alana Parnaby
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Alana Parnaby
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Yuki Naito
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Laquisa Khan
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Amelia Zylberman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Amelia Zylberman
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Georgiana Ruhrig
Player
Amelia Zylberman
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
10
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Amelia Zylberman
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yui Chikaraishi
Player
Amelia Zylberman
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Jelena Cvijanovic
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Katie Oliver
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
2
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
54 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(3) 4-6 14-12 | H2H | ||
view more
Parnaby Vs Zylberman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Parnaby are available here and Zylberman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
